Play Fantasy The Most Award Winning Fantasy game with real time scoring, top expert analysis, custom settings, and more. Play Now
 
Posted on: September 15, 2009 3:33 am
 

Week 1: Bills @ Patriots

Ok. I'll be quick because it's late and I really don't feel like going into it a lot.

First, The good:

1. Tom Brady to Ben Watson. The guy that everyone (including myself) was about to be cut/traded/etc has now saved the team week 1... Didn't that happen last year? *cough Matt Cassel cough*

2. The pass coverage. Despite how effectively at times the Bills could pass on the Patriots, there weren't many opportunities for deep passes because the corners and safeties had good coverage. The bills played a good game, but Lee Evans and Terrell Owens were nonfactors in terms of deep burners. All of that despite having mediocre pass rush at times.

3. Brandon Meriweather. I think that sums it up. Force a fumble to save the game. Was in tons of places. Definitely is taking a step in the right direction.

4. Tully Banta-Cain. A welcome surprise. I didn't expect much from him coming in and he had 2 sacks.

Now, The bad:
1. Tackling. It was just awful. I lost count. People were out of position and slow. Gary Guyton is not Jerod Mayo. (Captain Obvious, reporting for duty.) It's week 1, thankfully it didn't kill the Patriots.

2. Matt Light's first half. Where was he? Aaron Schobel embarrassed him. 1 sack and 1 int and 1 tripping penalty, but still, it was worse than that. he was practically a revolving door at times. Good thing he showed up in the second half.

3. The Defensive interior. Where were they? Wilfork had a sack. So did Mike Wright, but did I miss the rest of the pressure? I know Jerod Mayo was out, but did that really help 3 rookie OL to block an All Pro caliber line???

4. Gostkowski missing an easy field goal? Why? Poor guy. You win some, you lose some.

The Ugly:

1. The Patriots recognition of screens. Basically, the bills would just block everyone else and dare Vince Wilfork to chase down the back. It was painful to watch. 10+ yards on the plays the Patriots made famous.

2. Jerod Mayo going down. What is wrong? Please let it be minor. I am afraid it isn't. Not saying he won't be back next week, but without him, the team will be bad on tackling. He's a monster in the middle.

3. Terrell Owens. Did anyone see him fuming? It was funny. I feel bad for Trent Edwards already. And you know if a Patriots fan does, it must be bad...

4. Missing people: Julian Edelmann, Matthew Slater, BenJarvus Green-Ellis, Sammy Morris, Myron Pryor. I know not everyone can be on the 45 man roster, but I thought these guys were locks (Except lawfirm...). Did morris even get carry? If he's not going to play, I'd rather have BJGE on the roster. I'm glad slater wasn't there (next week, he'll break out for 4 TDs probably...) because he's my "next to go" patriot... baring a monster trade again.
Category: NFL
Posted on: May 14, 2008 10:23 pm
 

Spygate: An Inconvient Truth

Recently, it has become painfully obvious that most people are quite irritated at the NFL and the New Patriots for their "scouting" of NFL team's Offensive and Defensive signals. At first, as a fan, I was crushed too. As the story broke, it started to make less and less sense to me. Members of the press core who were former coaches, Jimmy Johnson most notably, started to admit and even imply that the Patriots were not the only teams to video-tape other teams.

Furthermore, in great detail, information started to arise that this was an NFL wide problem. Most recently, Roger Goddell said that "scouting NFL signals is commonplace and legal." Obviously, the use of a camera in certain spaces makes it more illegal than other places, but that's not what's troubling.

Keep in mind, the punishment of the Patriots was a 1st round pick in the 2008 NFL draft and a 750k dollar fine (500k to be paid directly out of Bill's own pocket).The punishment wasn't for spying. As a matter of fact, the spying is completely legal as pointed out above. It's merely where you spy from. If the Patriots had taped signals from the press box, a fine would have never been imposed. As Jimmy Johnson said though "it's not possible to tape signals from the press box when the team is on the wrong side." In other words, you can't tape their signals but they can tape yours, and it's 100% legal.

Jimmy Johnson also went on to elaborate by saying that the idea was given to him by then KC Chiefs sideline coach to tape from the sidelines. "You merely have to put an extra camera man beside the rest of them."

What has become painfully obvious is that the above is not only very unfair it is also very speculative. I won't attempt to convince you that Belichick believed in what he was doing was justified. I will attempt to merely justify it.

Now remember, if you are the team under the press box, the other team is completely in viewing range of the box. Cameras can be pointed in their direction and signals can be easily recorded. You are protected from this because the NFL prohibits you from taping from anywhere that is not enclosed by walls. There are no other places like this than 1 press box.

Well, you might be thinking that the tape recorded from the press box can't be very good. You obviously don't have an HDTV. HD Cameras (used to record games in High definition) have optical zoom levels exceeding 16x. What does that mean? It means that you can record video from the Press-box at nearly the same quality zoomed in as zoomed out. Imagine, High definition video of the Jets coordinator or the Chargers cheerleaders. Surely the NFL coaches would be able to get one such camera. 50k$ (not sure of the price, but that'd be absurdly expensive for a camera - my dad is a professional photographer. I'm positive the top cameras might go that high, but most do not)


What Belichick could have been thinking is that if it's legal for one team to do it (the home team) then it must be legal for another team to do it when they are on the road. I'm not saying he thought it was legal, but that it should be legal. It just doesn't seem to promote a competitive advantage to allow the home team to tape signals for future games. I mean, at one time, the Jets made the playoffs. If they taped the Patriots signals, they could possibly beat them because of it.



I'm not condoning the practice of breaking rules (I actually believe in strict enforcement), highlighting the obvious discrepancy is a must in this situation.


While most fans are tired and ready to move on, I really suggest they take a hard look at what really happened instead of listening to the "but they cheated" 'Hatriots'. (I hate that name, but it seems to become standardized).

This isn't a conspiracy theory. It's a reminder that the rules aren't always set up to be fair. Sometimes they are unfair and it's just not convienent to talk about where they fall short. The people that challenge the laws are often ruled as heretics or unclean, but history often stands on their side. Maybe Belichick is nothing more than a coach looking to bend or break rules or maybe he didn't want to be victimized by a practice he saw as common and biased.

Just a thought.
Category: NFL
 
 
 
 
The views expressed in this blog are solely those of the author and do not reflect the views of CBS Sports or CBSSports.com